Implant dentistry · 2012
Minimally invasive sinus augmentation using ultrasonic piezoelectric vibration and hydraulic pressure: a multicenter retrospective study.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Ji-Min, Sohn Dong-Seok, Heo Jeong-Uk, Park Jun-Sub, Jung Heui-Seung, Moon Jee-Won, Lee Ju-Hyoung, Park In-Sook
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success rate of implants and vertical bone gain of edentulous posterior maxilla using ultrasonic piezoelectric vibration and hydraulic pressure, namely the hydrodynamic piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (HPISE) technique through a crestal approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 250 maxillary sinuses were augmented using HPISE and 353 implants (averaging 11.8 mm in length and 4.5 mm in diameter), with 12 different systems, were placed simultaneously with or without additional bone grafting. Plain radiograms and cone beam computed tomograms were taken in all patients to evaluate sinus augmentation.
RESULTS: Membrane perforation was recorded at 10 of the 353 implant sites. The perforation rate was 2.83%. The total success rate of implantation was 97.2% after an average of 69.3 weeks of loading.
CONCLUSION: The crestally approached sinus augmentation using ultrasonic piezoelectric vibration and hydraulic pressure is an additional method of maxillary sinus augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 250 maxillary sinuses were augmented using HPISE and 353 implants (averaging 11.8 mm in length and 4.5 mm in diameter), with 12 different systems, were placed simultaneously with or without additional bone grafting. Plain radiograms and cone beam computed tomograms were taken in all patients to evaluate sinus augmentation.
RESULTS: Membrane perforation was recorded at 10 of the 353 implant sites. The perforation rate was 2.83%. The total success rate of implantation was 97.2% after an average of 69.3 weeks of loading.
CONCLUSION: The crestally approached sinus augmentation using ultrasonic piezoelectric vibration and hydraulic pressure is an additional method of maxillary sinus augmentation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone SubstitutesBone TransplantationCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsDental Prosthesis DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsJaw, EdentulousJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNasal MucosaOsseointegrationOsteogenesisPiezosurgeryPressureRetrospective StudiesSinus Floor AugmentationTreatment OutcomeVibrationYoung Adult