Sleep health · 2026
Modest first night effect on sleep in healthy school-age children using home-based polysomnography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Seah Jia Xu Toby, Nazareth Nicole A, Koa Tiffany B, Ong Ju Lynn, Lo June Chi-Yan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantify the first night effect in healthy school-age children by comparing sleep macro- and microstructure between 2 non-consecutive nights of home-based polysomnography.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 41 Singaporean children (mean age ± SD = 9.77 ± 1.29 years; 22 males) with data from 2 unattended home polysomnography recordings separated by at least 1 week. During the PSG nights, they were instructed to follow their habitual school-night sleep-wake timing. Within-subject differences in sleep macro- and microarchitecture were assessed using paired-sample t tests.
RESULTS: In the first night, children spent 15.97 minutes longer in bed (dz = 0.33, P = .04), with no difference in total sleep time (P = .87). Also, the first PSG night involved longer wake after sleep onset (10.63 ± 7.47 minutes, dz = 0.37, P = .02) and lower sleep efficiency (-2.28 ± 3.37%, dz: 0.38, P = .02). Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep latency was also delayed by 19.39 minutes in the first night (dz = 0.36, P = .03). Durations of sleep stages, N2 and N3 latencies, and mean and total power across delta to beta frequency bands did not differ between nights (ps > 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: In healthy school-age children sleeping at home, the first night effect appears modest, with small increases in nocturnal awakenings and delays in REM sleep onset, while sleep microstructure seems unaltered. These findings suggest that a single night of at-home PSG may provide relatively reliable sleep estimates for this age group.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 41 Singaporean children (mean age ± SD = 9.77 ± 1.29 years; 22 males) with data from 2 unattended home polysomnography recordings separated by at least 1 week. During the PSG nights, they were instructed to follow their habitual school-night sleep-wake timing. Within-subject differences in sleep macro- and microarchitecture were assessed using paired-sample t tests.
RESULTS: In the first night, children spent 15.97 minutes longer in bed (dz = 0.33, P = .04), with no difference in total sleep time (P = .87). Also, the first PSG night involved longer wake after sleep onset (10.63 ± 7.47 minutes, dz = 0.37, P = .02) and lower sleep efficiency (-2.28 ± 3.37%, dz: 0.38, P = .02). Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep latency was also delayed by 19.39 minutes in the first night (dz = 0.36, P = .03). Durations of sleep stages, N2 and N3 latencies, and mean and total power across delta to beta frequency bands did not differ between nights (ps > 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: In healthy school-age children sleeping at home, the first night effect appears modest, with small increases in nocturnal awakenings and delays in REM sleep onset, while sleep microstructure seems unaltered. These findings suggest that a single night of at-home PSG may provide relatively reliable sleep estimates for this age group.