American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2015
Postsurgical volumetric airway changes in 2-jaw orthognathic surgery patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hart P Sheamus, McIntyre Brian P, Kadioglu Onur, Currier G Fräns, Sullivan Steven M, Li Ji, Shay Christina
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Findings from early cephalometric studies on airway changes after 2-jaw orthognathic surgery have been challenged because the previous anteroposterior interpretation of airway changes can now be evaluated in 3 dimensions. The aims of this study were to use cone-beam computed tomography to quantify the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and total airway volume changes associated with skeletal movements of the maxilla and mandible in a sample of patients undergoing 2-jaw orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal malocclusion.
METHODS: Skeletal movements and airway volumes of 71 postpubertal patients (31 male, 40 female; mean age, 18.8 years) were measured. They were divided into 2 groups based on ANB angle, overjet, and occlusion (Class II: ANB, >2°; overjet, >1 mm; total, 35 subjects; and Class III: ANB, <1°; overjet, <1 mm; total, 36 subjects). Presurgical and postsurgical measurements were collected for horizontal, vertical, and transverse movements of the maxilla and the mandible, along with changes in the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and total airways. Associations between the directional movements of skeletal structures and the regional changes in airway volume were quantified. Changes in the most constricted area were also noted.
RESULTS: Horizontal movements of D-point were significantly associated with increases in both total airway (403.6 ± 138.6 mm(3); P <0.01) and oropharynx (383.9 ± 127.9 mm(3); P <0.01) volumes. Vertical movements of the posterior nasal spine were significantly associated with decreases in total airway volume (-459.2 ± 219.9 mm(3); P = 0.04) and oropharynx volume (-639.7 ± 195.3 mm(3); P <0.01), increases in nasopharynx (187.2 ± 47.1 mm(3); P <0.01) volume, and decreases in the most constricted area (-10.63 ± 3.69 mm(2); P <0.01). In the Class III patients only, the vertical movement of D-point was significantly associated with decreases in both total airway (-724.0 ± 284.4 mm(3); P = 0.02) and oropharynx (-648.2 ± 270.4 mm(3); P = 0.02) volumes. A similar negative association was observed for the most constricted area for the vertical movement of D-point (-15.45 ± 4.91 mm(2); P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal control of airway volume is through management of the mandible in the horizontal direction and the vertical movement of the posterior maxilla for all patients. The surgeon and the orthodontist should optimally plan these movements to control gains or losses in airway volume as a result of orthognathic surgery.
METHODS: Skeletal movements and airway volumes of 71 postpubertal patients (31 male, 40 female; mean age, 18.8 years) were measured. They were divided into 2 groups based on ANB angle, overjet, and occlusion (Class II: ANB, >2°; overjet, >1 mm; total, 35 subjects; and Class III: ANB, <1°; overjet, <1 mm; total, 36 subjects). Presurgical and postsurgical measurements were collected for horizontal, vertical, and transverse movements of the maxilla and the mandible, along with changes in the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and total airways. Associations between the directional movements of skeletal structures and the regional changes in airway volume were quantified. Changes in the most constricted area were also noted.
RESULTS: Horizontal movements of D-point were significantly associated with increases in both total airway (403.6 ± 138.6 mm(3); P <0.01) and oropharynx (383.9 ± 127.9 mm(3); P <0.01) volumes. Vertical movements of the posterior nasal spine were significantly associated with decreases in total airway volume (-459.2 ± 219.9 mm(3); P = 0.04) and oropharynx volume (-639.7 ± 195.3 mm(3); P <0.01), increases in nasopharynx (187.2 ± 47.1 mm(3); P <0.01) volume, and decreases in the most constricted area (-10.63 ± 3.69 mm(2); P <0.01). In the Class III patients only, the vertical movement of D-point was significantly associated with decreases in both total airway (-724.0 ± 284.4 mm(3); P = 0.02) and oropharynx (-648.2 ± 270.4 mm(3); P = 0.02) volumes. A similar negative association was observed for the most constricted area for the vertical movement of D-point (-15.45 ± 4.91 mm(2); P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal control of airway volume is through management of the mandible in the horizontal direction and the vertical movement of the posterior maxilla for all patients. The surgeon and the orthodontist should optimally plan these movements to control gains or losses in airway volume as a result of orthognathic surgery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAnatomic LandmarksCephalometryCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IIMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIMandibleMaxillaNasal BoneNasopharynxOrgan SizeOropharynxOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresOverbitePharynxVertical DimensionYoung Adult