MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02426458

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroradiology · 1990

Multiple slice FLASH imaging: an improved pulse sequence for contrast enhanced MR brain studies.

Schörner W, Sander B, Henkes H, Heim T, Lanksch W, Felix R

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A multisclice gradient echo sequence (FLASH) was compared with a conventional spin-echo (SE) technique with regard to its value for contrast enhanced brain studies. In 50 patients with contrast enhancing intracranial lesions, MR studies (0.5 Tesla MR tomograph) were performed with SE images (SE 400/30; four images/3.4 min) and FLASH scans (FLASH 315/14, 90 degrees; 15 images/1.4 min) before and after Gd-DTPA. Based on visual and quantitative assessment diagnostic results of postcontrast SE- and FLASH images were equivalent with respect to contrast enhancement, lesion/brain-contrast, lesion/edema-contrast, and lesion delineation. Although image quality generally was excellent on postcontrast FLASH images, susceptibility artifacts were more severe on FLASH scans than on SE images. However, with the exception of postoperative patients with artifacts due to metal remains, diagnostic information was not decreased by artifacts on postcontrast FLASH images. In conclusion, because of the clearly higher efficiency of the multisclice FLASH technique, this pulse sequence offers the opportunity to speed up contrast enhanced brain imaging.

Для цитирования: Schörner W, Sander B, Henkes H, Heim T, Lanksch W, Felix R. Multiple slice FLASH imaging: an improved pulse sequence for contrast enhanced MR brain studies.. Neuroradiology. 1990. DOI: 10.1007/bf02426458.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.