MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/epi.12868

Медицинская библиотека · Epilepsia · 2014

Gelastic seizures: incidence, clinical and EEG features in adult patients undergoing video-EEG telemetry.

Kovac Stjepana, Diehl Beate, Wehner Tim, Fois Chiara, Toms Nathan, Walker Matthew C, Duncan John S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study aimed to determine clinical features of adult patients with gelastic seizures recorded on video -electroencephalography (EEG) over a 5-year period. We screened video-EEG telemetry reports for the occurrence of the term "gelastic" seizures, and assessed the semiology, EEG features, and duration of those seizures. Gelastic seizures were identified in 19 (0.8%) of 2,446 admissions. The presumed epileptogenic zone was in the hypothalamus in one third of the cases, temporal lobe epilepsy was diagnosed in another third, and the remainder of the cases presenting with gelastic seizures were classified as frontal, parietal lobe epilepsy or remained undetermined or were multifocal. Gelastic seizures were embedded in a semiology, with part of the seizure showing features of automotor seizures. A small proportion of patients underwent epilepsy surgery. Outcome of epilepsy surgery was related to the underlying pathology; two patients with hippocampal sclerosis had good outcomes following temporal lobe resection and one of four patients with hypothalamic hamartomas undergoing gamma knife surgery had a good outcome.

Для цитирования: Kovac Stjepana, Diehl Beate, Wehner Tim, Fois Chiara, Toms Nathan, Walker Matthew C, Duncan John S. Gelastic seizures: incidence, clinical and EEG features in adult patients undergoing video-EEG telemetry.. Epilepsia. 2014. DOI: 10.1111/epi.12868.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.