Investigation of the ototoxicity of gadoteridol (ProHance) and gadodiamide (Omniscan) in mice.

CONCLUSION

In the mouse, when a tympanic perforation is present, gadoteridol does not seem to cause ototoxicity. Gadodiamide may cause mild ototoxicity other than toxicity to the outer hair cells of the cochlea.

OBJECTIVES

Endolymphatic hydrops have been visualized through intra-tympanic injection of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3-D FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging. However, reports on the safety of GBCAs are limited. This study aimed to assess ototoxicity of gadoteridol and gadodiamide.

METHOD: In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, myringotomies in the left ear were performed in 20 male C57 BL/6 mice. After testing the baseline auditory brainstem response (ABR) (range = 8-32 kHz), the test solution (gadoteridol, gadodiamide, saline, or cisplatin) was injected into the left ear. ABR testing was repeated 14 days after test solution application. In morphological experiments, images of post-mortem surface preparations were assessed for cochlear hair cell status.

RESULTS

At 14 days following gadoteridol application, there was no significant change in ABR thresholds at 8, 16, or 32 kHz. Gadodiamide application caused a significant change in the ABR threshold at 8 kHz. Apparent cochlear hair cell loss was not observed in the surface preparation after gadoteridol or gadodiamide application.