DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000003141
Transcanal Endoscopic Cartilage and Perichondrium Graft Myringoplasty for Large Tympanic Membrane Perforations.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following transcanal endoscopic cartilage and perichondrium double-layer myringoplasty for subtotal and total tympanic membrane (TM) perforations.
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective case review.
SETTING
Tertiary referral center.
METHODS
Adult patients who underwent transcanal endoscopic double-layer myringoplasty for subtotal and total TM perforations between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. The graft success rate, hearing outcomes, and complications were evaluated postoperatively. Temporal bone computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 24 months postoperatively.
RESULTS
The mean follow-up period was 28.2 ± 6.1 (range, 24-36) months. The graft success rate was in 95.7% (45/47) at 6 months, 93.6% (44/47) at 12 months, and 87.2% (41/47) at 24 months, respectively. The mean ABG improved from 32.89 ± 5.31 dB preoperatively to 10.89 ± 4.78 dB postoperatively 12 months (p < 0.05) for subtotal perforations; from 33.41 ± 7.41 dB preoperatively to 11.45 ± 2.41 dB postoperatively 12 months (p < 0.05) for total perforations. No graft-related complications (e.g., graft lateralization, significant blunting, graft atelectasis, graft adhesions, or effusion) were encountered during the follow-up period. Postoperative temporal bone imaging revealed a pneumatized middle ear and mastoid in all cases with no evidence of cholesteatoma.
CONCLUSIONS
Transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty for large TM perforations using a double-layer perichondrium and cartilage graft is feasible with comparable rates of closure to more invasive approaches.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.