MedElevator
Войти в исследования World neurosurgery · 2026
Vision Outcomes Following Endoscopic and Microscopic Transsphenoidal Resection of Sellar/Parasellar Lesions - A Systematic Review of the Literature.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lesha Emal, Dugan John E, Milton Camille, Nico Elsa, Eskin Logan, Yagmurlu Kaan, Begagic Emir, Pojskic Mirza, Arnautovic Kenan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Transsphenoidal surgery for the resection of pituitary neoplasms has evolved over the years. The current study sought to summarize visual outcomes following transsphenoidal surgery for sellar and parasellar lesions and evaluate how these outcomes are reported across the literature.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library database were searched from inception through October 2023. Studies were included if they reported pre- and post-operative visual outcomes for patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of sellar or parasellar lesions. Reviews, abstracts, and non-English studies were excluded. Rates of pre- and postoperative visual loss, visual field defects, and visual acuity impairment were collected. Postoperative outcomes were categorized as improved, normalized, unchanged, or worsened.
RESULTS: Of 3828 studies identified, 236 met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Pituitary adenomas accounted for 80% of cases, followed by craniopharyngiomas (14%) and meningiomas (4%). Preoperative visual loss, visual field defects, and visual acuity impairment were present in 55%, 51%, and 37% of patients, respectively. Postoperative improvement occurred in 76% of patients with visual loss, 73% with visual field defects, and 64% with visual acuity impairment, while 2%-11% experienced worsening of symptoms. Reporting completeness varied across studies, with fewer than half of studies reporting both pre- and post-operative outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Across all studies, approximately 76% of patients with preoperative visual impairment experienced postoperative improvement following transsphenoidal surgery. Reporting of visual outcomes remains highly variable, underscoring the need or standardized definitions and outcome measures in future research.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library database were searched from inception through October 2023. Studies were included if they reported pre- and post-operative visual outcomes for patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of sellar or parasellar lesions. Reviews, abstracts, and non-English studies were excluded. Rates of pre- and postoperative visual loss, visual field defects, and visual acuity impairment were collected. Postoperative outcomes were categorized as improved, normalized, unchanged, or worsened.
RESULTS: Of 3828 studies identified, 236 met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Pituitary adenomas accounted for 80% of cases, followed by craniopharyngiomas (14%) and meningiomas (4%). Preoperative visual loss, visual field defects, and visual acuity impairment were present in 55%, 51%, and 37% of patients, respectively. Postoperative improvement occurred in 76% of patients with visual loss, 73% with visual field defects, and 64% with visual acuity impairment, while 2%-11% experienced worsening of symptoms. Reporting completeness varied across studies, with fewer than half of studies reporting both pre- and post-operative outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Across all studies, approximately 76% of patients with preoperative visual impairment experienced postoperative improvement following transsphenoidal surgery. Reporting of visual outcomes remains highly variable, underscoring the need or standardized definitions and outcome measures in future research.