The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2026
Incidence of misophonia, associated auditory symptoms and sensory processing profiles in university students in Turkey: a comparative study of clinical, subclinical and control groups.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Şahin Kamişli Gurbet İpek, Ülkeroğlu Özlem, Karataş Sude, Durusu Aleyna Nur
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of misophonia among university students, examine its relationship with hyperacusis and tinnitus and explore the sensory processing patterns of individuals with misophonia in comparison to the control group.
METHODS: Based on the Misophonia Questionnaire severity scores, 81 clinical misophonia and 163 subclinical misophonia patients and 60 matched healthy-controls participated the study and evaluated with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire and the Dunn Adult/Adolescent Sensory Profile questionnaire.
RESULTS: The incidence of clinical misophonia was 19 per cent. The clinical misophonia group had significantly higher sensory-sensitivity and sensation-avoiding scores and lower low-registration scores (Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction; p < 0.017). Sensory processing scores across all sensory domains were significantly correlated with Misophonia Questionnaire scores. The strongest associations were moderate positive correlations in the touch (r = 0.444; p = 0.00) and visual (r = 0.420; p = 0.00) processing domains.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that misophonia involves heightened sensitivity and avoidance not only in auditory but also in movement, visual, touch and activity-related sensory areas, suggesting it is a complex atypical multisensory condition rather than purely audiological or psychiatric.
METHODS: Based on the Misophonia Questionnaire severity scores, 81 clinical misophonia and 163 subclinical misophonia patients and 60 matched healthy-controls participated the study and evaluated with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire and the Dunn Adult/Adolescent Sensory Profile questionnaire.
RESULTS: The incidence of clinical misophonia was 19 per cent. The clinical misophonia group had significantly higher sensory-sensitivity and sensation-avoiding scores and lower low-registration scores (Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction; p < 0.017). Sensory processing scores across all sensory domains were significantly correlated with Misophonia Questionnaire scores. The strongest associations were moderate positive correlations in the touch (r = 0.444; p = 0.00) and visual (r = 0.420; p = 0.00) processing domains.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that misophonia involves heightened sensitivity and avoidance not only in auditory but also in movement, visual, touch and activity-related sensory areas, suggesting it is a complex atypical multisensory condition rather than purely audiological or psychiatric.