MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.06.002

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of vascular surgery · 2014

Influence of the hostile neck on restenosis after carotid stenting.

Brown Kevin A, Itum Dina S, Duwayri Yazan, Reeves James G, Rajani Ravi, Veeraswamy Ravi K, Arya Shipra, Salam Atef, Dodson Thomas F, Brewster Luke P

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid stenosis is favored over carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with a hostile neck from prior CEA or cervical irradiation (XRT). However, the restenosis rate after CAS in patients with hostile necks is variable in the literature. The objective of this study was to quantify differences in the in-stent restenosis (ISR)/occlusion and reintervention rates after CAS in patients with and without a hostile neck. Here we hypothesize that patients with hostile necks have an increased ISR, and that this increase may add morbidity to these patients.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

All patients undergoing CAS from 2007 to 2013 for carotid artery stenosis with follow-up imaging at our institution were queried from our carotid database (n = 236). Patients with hostile necks, including both CAS after prior CEA (n = 65) and prior XRT (n = 37), were compared with patients who underwent CAS for other reasons including both anatomical (n = 46) and medical comorbidities (n = 88). The primary end points were ISR, repeat intervention, and stent occlusion. Secondary end points of the study were stroke/myocardial infarction (MI)/death at 30 days, perioperative cardiovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, MI, groin access complications, hyperperfusion syndrome, and periprocedural hypotension or bradycardia.

RESULTS

Despite the hostile neck cohort being younger and having lower incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, and renal insufficiency, they had a greater incidence of ISR (11% vs. 4%; P = .03) and required more reinterventions (8% vs. 2%; P = .04). Stent occlusion and periprocedural morbidity/mortality were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with hostile necks have increased risk of restenosis and need for reinterventions after CAS compared with patients without a hostile neck. However, they do not appear to have higher rates of stent occlusion or per-procedural events.

Для цитирования: Brown Kevin A, Itum Dina S, Duwayri Yazan, Reeves James G, Rajani Ravi, Veeraswamy Ravi K, Arya Shipra, Salam Atef, Dodson Thomas F, Brewster Luke P. Influence of the hostile neck on restenosis after carotid stenting.. Annals of vascular surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.06.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.