Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry · 2026
Cephalometric Assessment in Nonsyndromic Microtia Patients: Cross-Sectional Study with Comparison Group.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peixoto Cléuber Roberto, Olsson Bernardo, Weiss Suyany Gabriely, Caleme Eduardo, Topolski Francielle, Scariot Rafaela, Moro Alexandre
Аннотация
AIMS: To assess and compare the cephalometric characteristics of patients with nonsyndromic microtia.
METHODS AND RESULTS: This cross-sectional comparative study evaluated the cephalometric characteristics of 16 patients with nonsyndromic microtia and 48 patients without microtia (n = 48). A retrospective analysis was performed using lateral cephalograms, orthopantomograms, dental casts, facial photographs, and intraoral photographs. ANB (p = 0.044), FMA (p < 0.001), SN.GoGn (p = 0.003), Y-axis (p = 0.024), LAFH (p < 0.001), and 1-NB (p = 0.014) were higher in the microtia group, whereas 1.NA (p = 0.018) and IMPA (p = 0.029) were lower relative to controls. Twelve patients had deviation of the mandibular midline to the microtia side; one patient had left-sided microtia and deviation of the midline to the right side, and three patients did not exhibit mandibular midline deviation.
CONCLUSION: Patients with microtia showed prevalence of a Class II skeletal and dolichocephalic pattern, predisposition to upper incisor movement in the vertical direction, and lower incisor protrusion. In addition, they showed a tendency toward deviation of the lower midline to the affected side.
METHODS AND RESULTS: This cross-sectional comparative study evaluated the cephalometric characteristics of 16 patients with nonsyndromic microtia and 48 patients without microtia (n = 48). A retrospective analysis was performed using lateral cephalograms, orthopantomograms, dental casts, facial photographs, and intraoral photographs. ANB (p = 0.044), FMA (p < 0.001), SN.GoGn (p = 0.003), Y-axis (p = 0.024), LAFH (p < 0.001), and 1-NB (p = 0.014) were higher in the microtia group, whereas 1.NA (p = 0.018) and IMPA (p = 0.029) were lower relative to controls. Twelve patients had deviation of the mandibular midline to the microtia side; one patient had left-sided microtia and deviation of the midline to the right side, and three patients did not exhibit mandibular midline deviation.
CONCLUSION: Patients with microtia showed prevalence of a Class II skeletal and dolichocephalic pattern, predisposition to upper incisor movement in the vertical direction, and lower incisor protrusion. In addition, they showed a tendency toward deviation of the lower midline to the affected side.