MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.06.004

Медицинская библиотека · Respiratory medicine · 2008

Which obese children should have a sleep study?

McKenzie S A, Bhattacharya A, Sureshkumar R, Joshi B, Franklin A, Pickering R, Dundas I

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The UK government has recommended the development of obesity services for children. As obesity is common, studying every obese child for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) would be challenging and full paediatric sleep services are not available in every area in Europe. The purpose of this study was to consider how well clinical features predict significant OSA in obese children in order to help prioritise the need for sleep studies and subsequent treatment.

METHODS

Consecutive children referred for obesity management aged 2-16 years with a body mass index (BMI) of >2.5 z scores for age were offered a sleep study using overnight oximetry and audiovisual recordings. Significant OSA was defined as > or = 5 dips/h of >4% oxygen saturation or > or = 5 respiratory-event related arousals/h.

RESULTS

Forty-one of 158 (26%) children (mean BMI z score 3.7) had significant OSA and 95% of these had either reported apnoea, restless sleep or tonsillar hypertrophy (TH). Nineteen percent of all children had none of these features. BMI was not related to OSA.

CONCLUSION

If only obese children with reported apnoea, restless sleep or TH have a sleep study, 95% of all obese children with significant OSA will be identified using this method.

Для цитирования: McKenzie S A, Bhattacharya A, Sureshkumar R, Joshi B, Franklin A, Pickering R, Dundas I. Which obese children should have a sleep study?. Respiratory medicine. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.06.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.