Redefining Peer Tutoring: Academic and Social Gains Through Twice-Exceptional Student Leadership.
Аннотация
This study explored the dual effects-both academic and social-of a peer tutoring framework where a twice-exceptional student with autism spectrum disorder (2e-ASD) served as a tutor for three students with learning disabilities (LDs). The goal was to assess whether peer-mediated instruction could improve tutees' reading accuracy while fostering tutors' social development. Using a multiple baseline design across participants, with a numerous probe structure, ensured rigorous methodology and intervention fidelity. Reading accuracy was systematically monitored across phases, and social validity feedback from parents and educators offered insights into perceived academic and social outcomes. The results showed significant, sustained improvements in reading accuracy for all students with LD following the peer tutoring intervention. At the same time, qualitative feedback highlighted notable enhancements in the tutor's social engagement, communication and self-confidence. Stakeholders observed that the tutoring structure promoted positive peer relationships and increased classroom participation. These findings highlight the mutual benefits of peer tutoring, especially when the strengths of twice-exceptional learners are deliberately incorporated into instructional design. The research adds to growing evidence supporting inclusive, strength-based peer learning models. By demonstrating that peer tutoring can enhance multidimensional learning outcomes, this study presents a scalable instructional approach with practical implications for special education, collaborative learning and teacher training. The findings encourage wider adoption of peer-mediated frameworks that acknowledge and utilize diverse learner profiles.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.