MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.08.021

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025

Self-Perceived Hearing Outcomes With Radiation and Cisplatin or Radiation and Cetuximab for Patients With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer-Results From NRG Oncology RTOG 1016.

Runge Christina L, Lyness Jessica A, Gillison Maura L, Adelstein David J, Harari Paul M, Ringash Jolie, Geiger Jessica L, Krempl Greg A, Blakaj Dukagjin M, Bates James Edward, Galloway Thomas J, Jones Christopher U, Gensheimer Michael F, Dunlap Neal E, Phan Jack, Caudell Jimmy J, Pennington J Daniel, Torres-Saavedra Pedro A, Yom Sue S, Le Quynh-Thu, Movsas Benjamin

СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыРандомизированное исследованиеEquivalence TrialПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: RTOG 1016 was a noninferiority phase III trial comparing the efficacy of radiation with either cisplatin (RT + Cis) or cetuximab (RT + Cetux) for patients with Humman Papillomavirus (HPV)+ oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Perceived hearing handicap was included as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) secondary endpoint. The primary hypothesis was that perceived hearing handicap would be greater for patients receiving RT + Cis compared with RT + Cetux.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: Perceived hearing handicap was measured at baseline, end of treatment, and 3, 6, and 12 months posttreatment using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults Screening Version (HHIA-S), a 10-item self-assessment questionnaire designed to measure patients' reactions to their hearing loss. Mixed ordinal logistic models were used to determine the treatment effect on HHIA-S scores and handicap categories (2-sided α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The PRO substudy included 375 eligible patients. No significant differences in patient/tumor characteristics were found between patients who participated in the HHIA-S study versus those excluded. For total HHIA-S scores and social and emotional subscales, RT + Cetux had significantly lower (ie, better) scores from end of treatment. Change score from baseline to end of treatment for RT + Cis (4.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.57-6.07]) was greater than RT + Cetux (0.08; 95% CI, -1.15 to 1.31). For hearing handicap category, RT + Cis had a significantly higher percentage of mild/moderate and severe cases at the end of treatment (32%) compared with RT + Cetux (20%) (P < .0001). Adjusted conditional odds of higher self-perceived hearing handicap category for RT + Cis compared with RT + Cetux was 3.73 (95% CI, 2.10-6.62).

CONCLUSION

Patients have significantly worse self-perceived hearing handicap after receiving RT + Cis treatment than with RT + Cetux. This was consistent across time through 1 year posttreatment. These findings inform hearing-related outcomes for patients with HPV-associated OPC and indicate the need for ototoxicity monitoring with RT + Cis treatment.

Для цитирования: Runge Christina L, Lyness Jessica A, Gillison Maura L, Adelstein David J, Harari Paul M, Ringash Jolie, Geiger Jessica L, Krempl Greg A, Blakaj Dukagjin M, Bates James Edward, Galloway Thomas J, Jones Christopher U, Gensheimer Michael F, Dunlap Neal E, Phan Jack, Caudell Jimmy J, Pennington J Daniel, Torres-Saavedra Pedro A, Yom Sue S, Le Quynh-Thu, Movsas Benjamin. Self-Perceived Hearing Outcomes With Radiation and Cisplatin or Radiation and Cetuximab for Patients With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer-Results From NRG Oncology RTOG 1016.. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.08.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.