Implant dentistry · 2013
Alveolar distraction osteogenesis in posterior atrophic mandible: a case report on a new technical approach.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Felice Pietro, Lizio Giuseppe, Checchi Luigi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report a clinical case of dental implant rehabilitation of an atrophic posterior mandible with the usage of a new alveolar distraction protocol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A posterior atrophic mandible was treated with distraction osteogenesis; after the first phase of latency (10 days), the activation phase (24 days), and the consolidation phase (30 days), the distractor was removed, and 2 implants were placed; 4 months thereafter, the fixtures were provisionally loaded.
RESULTS: No complications were recorded during the treatment. At the end of the activation phase, a mean of 5 mm of vertical bone augmentation was obtained, and it allowed the placement of two 10-mm long fixtures. No periimplant bone resorption was detected at the time of definitive prosthetic loading.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed protocol secured a sound prosthetic rehabilitation on an otherwise atrophied posterior mandible so as to avoid grafting procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A posterior atrophic mandible was treated with distraction osteogenesis; after the first phase of latency (10 days), the activation phase (24 days), and the consolidation phase (30 days), the distractor was removed, and 2 implants were placed; 4 months thereafter, the fixtures were provisionally loaded.
RESULTS: No complications were recorded during the treatment. At the end of the activation phase, a mean of 5 mm of vertical bone augmentation was obtained, and it allowed the placement of two 10-mm long fixtures. No periimplant bone resorption was detected at the time of definitive prosthetic loading.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed protocol secured a sound prosthetic rehabilitation on an otherwise atrophied posterior mandible so as to avoid grafting procedures.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Alveolar ProcessAlveolar Ridge AugmentationAtrophyDental ArchDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsDental MaterialsDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, Partial, FixedDenture, Partial, TemporaryFemaleHumansJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyMandibleMiddle AgedOsseointegrationOsteogenesis, DistractionOsteotomyPiezosurgeryTitanium