Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nash Peter, Kerschbaumer Andreas, Dörner Thomas, Dougados Maxime, Fleischmann Roy M, Geissler Klaus, McInnes Iain, Pope Janet E, van der Heijde Désirée, Stoffer-Marx Michaela, Takeuchi Tsutomu, Trauner Michael, Winthrop Kevin L, de Wit Maarten, Aletaha Daniel, Baraliakos Xenofon, Boehncke Wolf-Henning, Emery Paul, Isaacs John D, Kremer Joel, Lee Eun Bong, Maksymowych Walter P, Voshaar Marieke, Tam Lai-Shan, Tanaka Yoshiya, van den Bosch Filip, Westhovens René, Xavier Ricardo, Smolen Josef S
Аннотация
METHODS: Existing data were evaluated by a steering committee and subsequently reviewed by a 29 person expert committee leading to the formulation of a consensus statement that may assist the clinicians, patients and other stakeholders once the decision is made to commence a JAKi. The committee included patients, rheumatologists, a gastroenterologist, a haematologist, a dermatologist, an infectious disease specialist and a health professional. The SLR informed the Task Force on controlled and open clinical trials, registry data, phase 4 trials and meta-analyses. In addition, approval of new compounds by, and warnings from regulators that were issued after the end of the SLR search date were taken into consideration.
RESULTS: The Task Force agreed on and developed four general principles and a total of 26 points for consideration which were grouped into six areas addressing indications, treatment dose and comedication, contraindications, pretreatment screening and risks, laboratory and clinical follow-up examinations, and adverse events. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined based on the SLR and levels of agreement were voted on for every point, reaching a range between 8.8 and 9.9 on a 10-point scale.
CONCLUSION: The consensus provides an assessment of evidence for efficacy and safety of an important therapeutic class with guidance on issues of practical management.