MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s1808-86942012000100019

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2012

Cephalometric evaluation of the oropharyngeal space in children with atypical deglutition.

Machado Almiro José, Crespo Agrício N

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: For several factors, not yet fully explained until now, infant deglutition may persist after changing the primary teeth and such swallowing is classified as atypical swallowing. Possible causes: finger sucking, bottle feeding, sucking the tongue and mouth breathing. There is no consensus about the etiology of atypical deglutition.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the oropharyngeal space in side-view radiographs of children with atypical deglutition and normal deglutition.

METHODS

Retrospective study, by means of cephalometric analysis of side-view radiographs, measuring the anteroposterior distance of the lumen of the airway in two groups: 55 cephalograms from the experimental group (with atypical deglutition) and 55 side-view radiographs from the control group (normal deglutition). Measurements from the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and a p value <0.05 was considered as an indication of statistical significance.

RESULTS

The median in the control group was 10 mm and in the experimental group it was 7 mm, with a statistically significant difference (p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The oropharyngeal space is reduced in the group with atypical deglutition.

Для цитирования: Machado Almiro José, Crespo Agrício N. Cephalometric evaluation of the oropharyngeal space in children with atypical deglutition.. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2012. DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942012000100019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.