European journal of applied physiology · 2025
Impact of normobaric hyperoxia on finger vasomotor and thermoperceptual responses to local cold in normothermic and mildly hypothermic individuals.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keramidas Michail E, Bowes Heather M, Moes Maaike I, Eiken Ola, Gennser Mikael
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate whether a sustained period of normobaric O2 breathing would modulate acral-skin vasoreactivity and thermosensitivity to localised cooling.
METHODS: Eight healthy men performed a 30-min normoxic and hyperoxic (100% O2) hand cold (8 °C water) provocation, while immersed to the chest either in 35.1 (0.4)°C (normothermic trial) or in 21.0 (0.1)°C (hypothermic trial) water. Finger temperature, circulatory and perceptual responses were monitored.
RESULTS: During the normothermic trial, hyperoxia augmented the cold-induced drop in finger temperature, and attenuated the rewarming (P = 0.03). Hyperoxia also enhanced the sensation of pain (P = 0.04). During the hypothermic trial, hyperoxia did not modify finger temperature, circulatory and perceptual responses to cold (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In normothermia, hyperoxia aggravates finger cold-induced vasoconstriction and pain sensation. In mild hypothermia, however, any hyperoxia-evoked influence on finger vasomotion and thermonociception is overridden by the generalised vasoconstriction and thermal discomfort instigated by whole-body cooling.
METHODS: Eight healthy men performed a 30-min normoxic and hyperoxic (100% O2) hand cold (8 °C water) provocation, while immersed to the chest either in 35.1 (0.4)°C (normothermic trial) or in 21.0 (0.1)°C (hypothermic trial) water. Finger temperature, circulatory and perceptual responses were monitored.
RESULTS: During the normothermic trial, hyperoxia augmented the cold-induced drop in finger temperature, and attenuated the rewarming (P = 0.03). Hyperoxia also enhanced the sensation of pain (P = 0.04). During the hypothermic trial, hyperoxia did not modify finger temperature, circulatory and perceptual responses to cold (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In normothermia, hyperoxia aggravates finger cold-induced vasoconstriction and pain sensation. In mild hypothermia, however, any hyperoxia-evoked influence on finger vasomotion and thermonociception is overridden by the generalised vasoconstriction and thermal discomfort instigated by whole-body cooling.