MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ocr.12026

Медицинская библиотека · Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2013

3D asymmetry of operated children with oral clefts.

Bugaighis I, Mattick C R, Tiddeman B, Hobson R

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To explore three-dimensional (3D) facial asymmetry differences in operated children with oral clefts and to compare the results with a control group.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: The sample comprised one hundred and three 8- to 12-year-old children: 40 with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP); 23 with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (UCLA); 19 with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP); 21 with cleft palate (CP) and 80 sex- and age-matched controls living in the North East of England.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

3D stereophotogrammetric facial scans were recorded for each participant at rest. Thirty-nine landmarks were recorded for each scan. The x, y and z coordinates for each landmark were extracted. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were conducted to identify 3D landmark asymmetry differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed between all the groups. The UCLP and UCLA patients displayed the greatest asymmetry, followed by the BCLP group. The CP group was the least asymmetric among the cleft groups. Asymmetry was present to a lesser extent in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Shape analysis indicates the possible differences in the aetiology and growth pattern of the CP group compared to UCLA or UCLP and BCLP groups.

Для цитирования: Bugaighis I, Mattick C R, Tiddeman B, Hobson R. 3D asymmetry of operated children with oral clefts.. Orthodontics & craniofacial research. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.