MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.006

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2016

Review of quantitative outcome analysis of cranial morphology in craniosynostosis.

Lloyd Mark S, Buchanan Edward P, Khechoyan David Y

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Outcome measures in craniosynostosis surgery have progressed from those based on the need for surgical revision to linear anthropometric measurements, 2D CT vector analysis and 3D CT vector analysis. However, finding an objective means to assess postoperative cranial morphological improvement remains challenging. A critical review of previous studies used to measure craniosynostosis surgery outcomes is presented. We also introduce and briefly discuss the key features of the computational algorithm that is being utilized in our center for evaluating craniosynostosis surgical outcomes. This has addressed a number of the previous challenges encountered in quantitative measurement of cranial morphological change. Point cloud representation and 3D stereophotogrammetry have made it possible to compare pre and post-operative images of children undergoing surgical correction for craniosynostosis. These pre- and post-operative images can also be compared to age, sex and race-matched controls throughout the patient's lifetime allowing longitudinal changes to be measured on follow up.

Для цитирования: Lloyd Mark S, Buchanan Edward P, Khechoyan David Y. Review of quantitative outcome analysis of cranial morphology in craniosynostosis.. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.