Application of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and low pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) to the classification / characterisation of low grade glioneuronal tumours.
Аннотация
AIMS: Glioneuronal tumours, although rare, are an important cause of treatment-resistant epilepsy. Differential diagnosis of glioneuronal tumour subtypes is complicated by their variable histological appearance and the lack of pathognomonic histological or molecular biomarkers. In this study we have applied techniques available in a diagnostic laboratory setting to characterise molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities in a single institution cohort of glioneuronal tumours.
METHODS
A cohort of 29 glioneuronal tumours that included 21 gangliogliomas and 5 dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumours (DNETs) was analysed using low pass whole genome sequencing (WGS) and 2 multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) central nervous system (CNS) tumour probesets.
RESULTS
Low pass WGS identified chromosomal or subchromosomal alterations in 15 specimens. The most common chromosomal alterations were gains of chromosome 7 (n = 8) and chromosome 16 (n = 3). The BRAFV600E mutation was detected by MLPA in 9/21 (42.9%) gangliogliomas and 2/2 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXAs). Chromosome 7 gains detected by WGS were reflected in MLPAs by overall gains of chromosome 7 gene probes, including those for BRAF, KIAA1549 and EGFR, while an internal BRAF/MKRN1 duplication was detected in a single ganglioglioma. Homozygous CDKN2A/B loss was detected by MLPA in 3 gangliogliomas, with p16 immunohistochemistry supporting these results.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of low pass WGS and MLPA identifies multiple, diverse genetic and chromosomal alterations in glioneuronal tumours, irrespective of histological tumour grade.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.