MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.12.002

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of fluency disorders · 2010

Analysis of five cases with neurogenic stuttering following brain injury in the basal ganglia.

Tani Tetsuo, Sakai Yasujiro

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: This study examined stuttering patterns in five patients with basal ganglia injury. None of the patients had a history of developmental stuttering. Four patients were right-handed; one patient was ambidextrous. Stuttering tests administered to patients assessed sentence repetition, reading aloud, explanations of a comic strip, and conversation. Accessory behaviors such as facial grimaces, associated movements of the limbs, and avoidance behaviors were observed. The results of this study differ from those of previous studies of neurogenic stuttering in several respects: (1) blocks were frequently observed. (2) Adaptation was observed. (3) Almost all stuttering occurred at the initiation of words. (4) Across patients, stuttering frequency did not vary in a consistent manner with speaking task. New speech characteristics for neurogenic stuttering without aphasia following injury to the basal ganglia are described.

EDUCATIONAL

OBJECTIVES

After reading this text, the reader will be able to: (1) provide characteristics of neurogenic stuttering after the basal ganglia in patients without aphasia; (2) discuss the difference of the features and characteristics of stuttering between previously reported patients and present patients.

Для цитирования: Tani Tetsuo, Sakai Yasujiro. Analysis of five cases with neurogenic stuttering following brain injury in the basal ganglia.. Journal of fluency disorders. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.12.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.