MedElevator
Войти в исследования Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2008
Analysis of clinical usefulness of the heat flux technique: predictability of the recovery from neurosensory disturbances in the chin undergoing mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Satoh Yuriko, Kabasawa Yuhji, Jinno Shigeharu, Omura Ken
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prognosis of the neurosensory disturbance (NSD) in the chin after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO), using the heat flux technique.
STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-nine patients (total 58 sides) undergoing BSSRO were examined. The warm sensory threshold (WHF) and cold sensory threshold (CHF) in the chins of these patients were measured by the heat flux technique. Touch sensory threshold (TS) was measured by an Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer. Touch sensory disturbance was subjectively evaluated by visual analog scale.
RESULTS: At all of the postoperative time points, there were no significant differences in the incidence rate among all tests (chi-squared test; P > .05). WHF, CHF, and TS were significantly correlated with the subjective evaluation. Recovery from NSD was delayed in cases that the postoperative variation of 2 weeks was >400 W/m(2) in WHF and CHF and the filament marking at 2 weeks after surgery was >3.5 in TS.
CONCLUSION: The heat flux technique appears to be a useful method for the prediction of the recovery from NSD in the chin.
STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-nine patients (total 58 sides) undergoing BSSRO were examined. The warm sensory threshold (WHF) and cold sensory threshold (CHF) in the chins of these patients were measured by the heat flux technique. Touch sensory threshold (TS) was measured by an Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer. Touch sensory disturbance was subjectively evaluated by visual analog scale.
RESULTS: At all of the postoperative time points, there were no significant differences in the incidence rate among all tests (chi-squared test; P > .05). WHF, CHF, and TS were significantly correlated with the subjective evaluation. Recovery from NSD was delayed in cases that the postoperative variation of 2 weeks was >400 W/m(2) in WHF and CHF and the filament marking at 2 weeks after surgery was >3.5 in TS.
CONCLUSION: The heat flux technique appears to be a useful method for the prediction of the recovery from NSD in the chin.