The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2004
Maxillary and mandibular displacement in hemifacial microsomia: a longitudinal Roentgen stereometric study of 21 patients with the aid of metallic implants.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sarnäs Karl-Victor, Rune Bodil, Aberg Magnus
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To record maxillary and mandibular displacement with articular growth and in response to bimaxillary surgical repositioning in patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) and to observe ipsilateral corpus/ramus growth in severely affected children.
DESIGN: Prospective roentgen stereometric analysis (mean age 7 years 10 months to 18 years 0 months) and retrospective profile and panoramic roentgenograms. Mean total observation period was 9 years 1 month.
SETTING: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Malmö University Hospital (Malmö, Sweden).
PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients consecutively diagnosed from 1976 through 1988 with HMF, five of whom had bimaxillary surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Surgery was performed at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Implants were inserted at the initial reconstructive surgical procedure under general anesthesia. Roentgen examinations were performed in connection with continued clinical evaluations and treatment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stereo roentgenograms were digitized at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Malmö University Hospital (Malmö, Sweden).
RESULTS: Displacement of the jaws with articular growth and in response to bimaxillary surgical repositioning varied interindividually with no apparent common pattern. Relapse displacement occurred several years after bimaxillary surgery. Mandibular growth changes were found in the corpus/ramus area and alveolar process on the affected side.
CONCLUSIONS: A marked interindividual variability of maxillary and mandibular displacement indicates that the relevance of statistical analysis of HFM growth data may be questioned. We would suggest that precise and accurate longitudinal recordings of growth and response to surgery in individual HFM patients be more appropriate.
DESIGN: Prospective roentgen stereometric analysis (mean age 7 years 10 months to 18 years 0 months) and retrospective profile and panoramic roentgenograms. Mean total observation period was 9 years 1 month.
SETTING: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Malmö University Hospital (Malmö, Sweden).
PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients consecutively diagnosed from 1976 through 1988 with HMF, five of whom had bimaxillary surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Surgery was performed at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Implants were inserted at the initial reconstructive surgical procedure under general anesthesia. Roentgen examinations were performed in connection with continued clinical evaluations and treatment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stereo roentgenograms were digitized at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Malmö University Hospital (Malmö, Sweden).
RESULTS: Displacement of the jaws with articular growth and in response to bimaxillary surgical repositioning varied interindividually with no apparent common pattern. Relapse displacement occurred several years after bimaxillary surgery. Mandibular growth changes were found in the corpus/ramus area and alveolar process on the affected side.
CONCLUSIONS: A marked interindividual variability of maxillary and mandibular displacement indicates that the relevance of statistical analysis of HFM growth data may be questioned. We would suggest that precise and accurate longitudinal recordings of growth and response to surgery in individual HFM patients be more appropriate.