Orthodontic premaxillary setback versus premaxillary osteotomy with gingivoperiosteoplasty for Bilateral cleft lip and palate patients: 4-year observation outcomes.

UNLABELLED: Patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) generally require several stages of treatment, and adequate maxillary development without orthognathic surgery is not easy to achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine short-term outcomes of orthodontic premaxillary setback (OPS) and premaxillary osteotomy (PO) for complete BCLP treatment.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with BCLP were consecutively treated for 4 years by a single surgeon. All patients were categorized by three indications for the first operation: OPS1, cheiloplasty + gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) + palatoplasty; OPS2, cheiloplasty + GPP; and PO, cheiloplasty + GPP + PO. Cephalograms for maxillary growth and velopharyngeal function (VPF) were judged at 4 years old, before orthodontic treatment.

RESULTS

OPS1 was performed in 14 cases, OPS2 in 8 cases, and PO in 4 cases. As for cephalometric analysis at 4 years old, no significant differences between groups were seen in any cephalometric measurements. As for speech outcomes, assessment of VPF at 80.8±14.8 months was good in 17 cases, slightly impaired in 8 cases, and marginally impaired in 1 case, with no severely impaired cases.

DISCUSSION: No significant differences in maxillary growth or speech outcomes were seen between OPS1, OPS2, and PO groups at 4 years old, possibly because all groups showed the same position of the premaxilla after the first operation.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in maxillary growth or speech outcomes were seen for 26 patients with BCLP between OPS1, OPS2, and PO groups at 4 years old. However, the long-term growth characteristics remain unclear.