MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1024/1422-4917.37.6.499

Медицинская библиотека · Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · 2009

[Is a specific disorder of arithmetic skills as common as reading/spelling disorder?].

Wyschkon Anne, Kohn Juliane, Ballaschk Katja, Esser Günter

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Referring to the prevalence rates of learning disorders in the research literature, the numbers of mathematics disorder and reading/spelling disorder are often reported to be identical. However, the correlation between intelligence level and reading/spelling skills is much weaker than between intelligence and arithmetic skills. If the same definition criterion is applied to both disorders, a lower prevalence rate for mathematics disorder should be expected.

OBJECTIVE

Are there differences in the prevalence estimates for learning disorders depending on the definition criterion?

METHOD: A large representative sample of German students (N=1970) was used to review the hypothesis.

RESULTS

Depending on the definition criterion, we could show a prevalence range of mathematics disorder between 0.1% and 8.1% in the same sample. Using the same definition criterion for both learning disorders, there are two to three times as many students with reading/spelling disorder than those with mathematics disorder.

DISCUSSION: Whenever children with reading/spelling disorder are compared to children with mathematics disorder, the same definition criterion has to be applied.

Для цитирования: Wyschkon Anne, Kohn Juliane, Ballaschk Katja, Esser Günter. [Is a specific disorder of arithmetic skills as common as reading/spelling disorder?].. Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 2009. DOI: 10.1024/1422-4917.37.6.499.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.