Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2023
The feasibility and acceptability of mobile ecological momentary assessment to evaluate sleep, family functioning, and affect in patients with pediatric craniopharyngioma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al Ghriwati Nour, Winter Marcia, Semko Joshua, Merchant Thomas E, Crabtree Valerie McLaughlin
Аннотация
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of mobile ecological momentary assessment (mEMA) for youth with craniopharyngioma and evaluate daily associations among family functioning, affect, and sleep difficulties.
DESIGN/RESEARCH APPROACH: Youth completed two mEMA diaries per day for one week.
SAMPLE/PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine youth who underwent surgery and proton radiotherapy (when indicated) for craniopharyngioma.
METHODS/METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH: Descriptive statistics and multi-level modeling were used to examine feasibility and acceptability of mEMA and daily associations among family functioning, affect, and sleep.
FINDINGS: Youth reported satisfaction and minimal burden from completing daily mEMA diaries. Poorer family functioning was not related to lower sleep efficiency.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: mEMA is an acceptable and feasible method for evaluating sleep and related variables in children and adolescents with craniopharyngioma.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS OR POLICY: Results highlight the utility of gathering mEMA data in youth at elevated risk for sleep difficulties as a function of their illness/treatment.
DESIGN/RESEARCH APPROACH: Youth completed two mEMA diaries per day for one week.
SAMPLE/PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine youth who underwent surgery and proton radiotherapy (when indicated) for craniopharyngioma.
METHODS/METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH: Descriptive statistics and multi-level modeling were used to examine feasibility and acceptability of mEMA and daily associations among family functioning, affect, and sleep.
FINDINGS: Youth reported satisfaction and minimal burden from completing daily mEMA diaries. Poorer family functioning was not related to lower sleep efficiency.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: mEMA is an acceptable and feasible method for evaluating sleep and related variables in children and adolescents with craniopharyngioma.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS OR POLICY: Results highlight the utility of gathering mEMA data in youth at elevated risk for sleep difficulties as a function of their illness/treatment.