m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2024

Heterogeneity in response to Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis.

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Alicandro Gianfranco, Gramegna Andrea, Bellino Federica, Sciarrabba Sathya Calogero, Lanfranchi Chiara, Contarini Martina, Retucci Mariangela, Daccò Valeria, Blasi Francesco

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Highly effective modulators of the CFTR channel have been demonstrated to dramatically impact disease progression and outcome. However, real-world data indicates that the magnitude of the clinical benefit is not equal among all patients receiving the treatment. We aimed to assess the variability in treatment response (as defined by the 6-month change in sweat chloride concentration, forced expiratory volume in one second [ppFEV1], body mass index [BMI], and CF Questionnaire-Revised [CFQ-R] respiratory domain score) and identify potential predictors in a group of patients receiving Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor (ETI) triple combination therapy.

METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study enrolling adults with CF at a major center in Italy. We used linear regression models to identify a set of potential predictors (including CFTR genotype, sex, age, and baseline clinical characteristics) and estimate the variability in treatment response.

RESULTS: The study included 211 patients (median age: 29 years, range: 12-58). Median changes (10-90th percentile) from baseline were: - 56 mEq/L (-76; -27) for sweat chloride concentration, +14.5 points (2.5; 32.0) for ppFEV1, +0.33 standard deviation scores (-0.13; 1.05) for BMI and +17 points (0; 39) for the CFQ-R respiratory domain score. The selected predictors explained 23 % of the variability in sweat chloride concentration changes, 18 % of the variability in ppFEV1 changes, 39 % of the variability in BMI changes, and 65 % of the variability in CFQ-R changes.

CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a high level of heterogeneity in treatment response to ETI, which can only be partially explained by the baseline characteristics of the disease.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты