MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215112002332

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2012

Mastoid subperiosteal abscess in children: drainage or mastoidectomy?

Psarommatis I, Giannakopoulos P, Theodorou E, Voudouris C, Carabinos C, Tsakanikos M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the management of mastoid subperiosteal abscess using two different surgical approaches: simple mastoidectomy and abscess drainage.

METHOD: The medical records of 34 children suffering from acute mastoiditis with subperiosteal abscess were retrospectively reviewed. In these cases, the initial surgical approach consisted of either myringotomy plus simple mastoidectomy or myringotomy plus abscess drainage.

RESULTS

Thirteen children were managed with simple mastoidectomy and 21 children were initially managed with abscess drainage. Of the second group, 12 children were cured without further treatment while 9 eventually required mastoidectomy. None of the children developed complications during hospitalisation, or long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Simple mastoidectomy remains the most effective procedure for the management of mastoid subperiosteal abscess. Drainage of the abscess represents a simple and risk-free, but not always curative, option. It can be safely used as an initial, conservative approach in association with myringotomy and sufficient antibiotic coverage, with simple mastoidectomy reserved for non-responding cases.

Для цитирования: Psarommatis I, Giannakopoulos P, Theodorou E, Voudouris C, Carabinos C, Tsakanikos M. Mastoid subperiosteal abscess in children: drainage or mastoidectomy?. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2012. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215112002332.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.