Acta oto-laryngologica · 2020
Endoscopic myringoplasty in pediatric patients: a comparison of cartilage graft push-through and underlay fascia graft techniques.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lou Zhengcai
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although myringoplasty is performed in pediatric patients, there is still no consensus on the graft material and surgerical procedure.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-and long- term graft take rates of the cartilage push-through and fascia graft techniques employed during pediatric myringoplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 93 pediatric patients with perforation who underwent myringoplasty were randomized into the cartilage push-through and underlay fascia graft group. The outcomes evaluated were hearing gains, and graft success rates at 12 and 24 months.
RESULTS: The graft success rate was similar between two groups (95.7% vs 91.3%, p = .653) at postoperative 12th months, however, the graft success rate was significantly higher 91.5% for the cartilage graft group compared with 73.9% for the fascia group at postoperative 24th months. No significant between-group differences were observed pre- (p = .694) or post- (p = .812) operative ABG values or mean ABG gain (p = .745).The re-perforation rate in fascia group was significantly higher than that in push through group (19.05 vs. 4.44%). No middle ear cholesteatoma formation was found in either group.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic cartilage push-through and underlay fascia graft myringoplasty afforded comparable hearing results in pediatric patients; however, the push-through technique without the elevation of a tympanomeatal flap exhibited better long-term graft success rate compared to underlay fascia graft.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-and long- term graft take rates of the cartilage push-through and fascia graft techniques employed during pediatric myringoplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 93 pediatric patients with perforation who underwent myringoplasty were randomized into the cartilage push-through and underlay fascia graft group. The outcomes evaluated were hearing gains, and graft success rates at 12 and 24 months.
RESULTS: The graft success rate was similar between two groups (95.7% vs 91.3%, p = .653) at postoperative 12th months, however, the graft success rate was significantly higher 91.5% for the cartilage graft group compared with 73.9% for the fascia group at postoperative 24th months. No significant between-group differences were observed pre- (p = .694) or post- (p = .812) operative ABG values or mean ABG gain (p = .745).The re-perforation rate in fascia group was significantly higher than that in push through group (19.05 vs. 4.44%). No middle ear cholesteatoma formation was found in either group.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic cartilage push-through and underlay fascia graft myringoplasty afforded comparable hearing results in pediatric patients; however, the push-through technique without the elevation of a tympanomeatal flap exhibited better long-term graft success rate compared to underlay fascia graft.