MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.06.035

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2018

Adenoid size by drug induced sleep endoscopy compared to nasopharyngeal mirror exam.

Zalzal Habib G, Carr Michele, Kohler William, Coutras Steven W

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To establish how assessment of adenoid size is correlated between drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) with indirect mirror nasopharyngoscopy (IMN).

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic hospital.

METHODS

Over a 6-year period, 154 pediatric patients underwent DISE for obstructive sleep apnea and had IMN. DISE videos were assessed by one reviewer, blinded to results of mirror exams. IMN findings were taken from operative notes recorded by one attending physician. Demographic data, co-morbidities, and sleep study results were also recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-three (58.5%) males and 66 (41.5%) females were included. Mean age at DISE was 7.34 ± 3.99 years, with an average of 29 days after DISE until nasopharyngeal mirror examination. The mean initial adenoid size based on DISE assessment was 2.62 + 0.99, and on nasopharyngeal mirror assessment was 2.56 + 0.97. DISE and IMN assessment of adenoid size correlated well (Spearman's Rho = 0.82, P < 0.00001; Kendal tau = 0.764, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

DISE has proven to be an excellent tool to assess adenoid size prior to adenoidectomy in children with OSA.

Для цитирования: Zalzal Habib G, Carr Michele, Kohler William, Coutras Steven W. Adenoid size by drug induced sleep endoscopy compared to nasopharyngeal mirror exam.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.06.035.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.